{"id":1028,"date":"2010-12-01T22:08:27","date_gmt":"2010-12-01T16:38:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mohamediqbalp.wordpress.com\/2010\/12\/01\/u-s-pressured-saudis-to-accept-climate-change-agreement\/"},"modified":"2010-12-01T22:08:27","modified_gmt":"2010-12-01T16:38:27","slug":"u-s-pressured-saudis-to-accept-climate-change-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/2010\/12\/01\/u-s-pressured-saudis-to-accept-climate-change-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. Pressured Saudis to Accept Climate Change Agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 class=\"articleTitle\">Leaked Cables Show U.S. Pressured Saudis to Accept Copenhagen Accord<\/h2>\n<p>The handful of climate-related cables&#8211;among the <\/p>\n<p id=\"articleDek\">hundreds of thousands of secret and unclassified messages released by <br \/>the whistle-blower organization Wikileaks&#8211;show the United States put <br \/>climate change at the center of its foreign policy relationship with the<br \/> oil-producing giant<\/p>\n<p>By  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/author.cfm?id=1917\">Lisa Friedman<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/author.cfm?id=2312\">Climatewire<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"articleInfo\"><span class=\"byline\">\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span><span class=\"datestamp\">November 30, 2010<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<div class=\"moduleHolder\"><\/p>\n<p class=\"in-article-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/media\/inline\/leaked-cables-show-us-pressured_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"277\" \/><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"imageCaption\"><b><b>CLIMATE DIPLOMACY<\/b>: <\/b> The <br \/>Obama administration leaned heavily on Saudi Arabia to associate itself <br \/>with the Copenhagen Accord climate change agreement, confidential State <br \/>Department memos show.<\/span><br \/>\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"imageCredit\">Image: Pete Souza, courtesy whitehouse.gov<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p>The Obama administration leaned heavily on Saudi Arabia to <br \/>associate itself with the Copenhagen Accord climate change agreement, <br \/>confidential State Department memos show.<\/p>\n<p>The handful of climate-related cables &#8212; among the hundreds of thousands<br \/> of secret and unclassified messages released by the whistle-blower <br \/>organization Wikileaks &#8212; show the United States put climate change at <br \/>the center of its foreign policy relationship with the oil-producing <br \/>giant in the months after last year&#8217;s blowout U.N. climate summit in <br \/>Denmark.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You have the opportunity to head off a serious clash over climate <br \/>change,&#8221; James Smith, the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, wrote to <br \/>Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton as she prepared for a February<br \/> visit to the kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Saudi officials are very concerned that a climate change treaty would <br \/>significantly reduce their income just as they face significant costs to<br \/> diversify their economy,&#8221; Smith wrote. &#8220;The King is particularly <br \/>sensitive to avoid Saudi Arabia being singled out as the bad actor, <br \/>particularly on environmental issues.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And in a memo summarizing the trip of Assistant Secretary of State for <br \/>Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman to Saudi Arabia in January, Smith <br \/>wrote that Feltman urged the country to send a formal notice to the <br \/>United Nations indicating its acceptance of the climate pact.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A\/S Feltman noted the importance that the President places on climate <br \/>change, and the Copenhagen Accord,&#8221; Smith wrote. &#8220;Given that Minister of<br \/> Petroleum Al-Naimi was involved in crafting the final agreement, A\/S <br \/>Feltman noted the United States is counting on Saudi Arabia to associate<br \/> itself with the accord by January 31.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Saudi leaders were noncommittal, according to the cable, noting that the<br \/> country&#8217;s ministries would need to consult on the topic.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A push for information on key negotiators<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The memos come as international climate talks kick off in Cancun, <br \/>Mexico. This year, the focus of the United States is to nail down the <br \/>agreements that President Obama and other world leaders made in <br \/>Copenhagen and to devise a set of formal decisions setting in motion <br \/>emission cuts and the mobilization of funding for poor countries that so<br \/> far has been agreed to in principle.<\/p>\n<p>The vast majority of the leaked cables deal with Iran&#8217;s nuclear program <br \/>and other diplomatic issues. But the handful of times that climate <br \/>change is raised, it appears as a front-burner Obama administration <br \/>issue, a ClimateWire review of the cables found. They provide new <br \/>insight into the behind-the-scenes discussions leading up to Copenhagen <br \/>and the focus of the administration after the meeting.<\/p>\n<p>In the months before Copenhagen, the summit was listed as a &#8220;substantive<br \/> issue&#8221; about which diplomats were directed to gather information. One <br \/>memo getting a lot of attention asks U.S. envoys at the United Nations <br \/>and elsewhere to procure credit card and frequent flier numbers as well <br \/>as other biographical data. In that same document, diplomats are <br \/>instructed to relate &#8220;perceptions of key negotiators on U.S. positions <br \/>in environmental negotiations&#8221; and indications about how cooperative <br \/>countries may be.<\/p>\n<p>The document also asks diplomats to be on the lookout for information <br \/>about whether countries adhere to their own environmental programs and <br \/>laws, and any &#8220;efforts by treaty secretariats to influence treaty <br \/>negotiations or compliance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>China makes a brief appearance in the cables. After a meeting of G-5 <br \/>ambassadors in Beijing in May, acting Deputy Chief of Mission William <br \/>Weinstein relayed to Washington that U.K. and Chinese officials <br \/>discussed the then-upcoming Copenhagen talks.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In the lead up to Copenhagen, China would not agree to targets on <br \/>emissions, but was willing to be constructive and would come to <br \/>Copenhagen with a package of action items related to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/topic.cfm?id=nuclear-power\">nuclear power<\/a>,<br \/> renewable energy and reforestation,&#8221; Weinstein wrote, adding that the <br \/>U.K. diplomat added that &#8220;his impression was that China could be induced<br \/> to do more on climate change.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, by the time nations met in Copenhagen, China had pledged to cut <br \/>its carbon intensity about 45 percent below 2005 levels in the next <br \/>decade.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Warning signals about skeptics in France<\/strong><br \/>U.S. European envoys sent up warning flares early last year about both <br \/>the U.S. political landscape and prospects for Copenhagen. In a memo <br \/>called &#8220;Scenesetter,&#8221; as Secretary Clinton prepared for a trip to France<br \/> late last year, U.S. Ambassador to France Charles Rivkin included the <br \/>heading, &#8220;An urgent focus on climate change.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In it, he wrote, &#8220;The French remain divided on how to respond to the Obama administration&#8217;s approaches to climate change.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>At the time, the U.S. House had passed legislation to cut carbon <br \/>emissions about 17 percent below 2005 levels in the next decade &#8212; a <br \/>target that much of Europe considered pitifully low. The Senate later <br \/>failed to pass any climate bill, and cap-and-trade legislation is these <br \/>days considered dead for the foreseeable future.<\/p>\n<p>According to the November 2009 cable, though, French analysts were early<br \/> in recognizing a difficult U.S. political horizon, and American <br \/>officials worked hard to stamp out concerns about the strength of the <br \/>Obama administration&#8217;s commitment to climate action.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Even sophisticated observers are skeptical that long-term reduction <br \/>goals legislated in the United States can be counted on as more than <br \/>aspirations, especially if radical cuts are not imposed up front,&#8221; <br \/>Rivkin wrote. &#8220;We have reiterated that U.S. laws are reliably enforced <br \/>by the federal government and by U.S. courts, using the Clean Air Act as<br \/> an example.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rivkin also said that officials in France&#8217;s Ministry of Foreign Affairs <br \/>took exception to a comment that Environment Minister Jean-Louis Borloo <br \/>made criticizing the U.S. House measure, and described the minister&#8217;s <br \/>comments as &#8220;distracting attention from the need for China and India to <br \/>reduce their rates of growth of GHG.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Germans lowered expectations before Copenhagen<\/strong><br \/>And as Clinton arrived in Germany to celebrate the 20th anniversary of <br \/>the fall of the Berlin Wall in early December, clim<br \/>\nate change was also <br \/>high on the agenda. According to the Nov. 5, 2009, cable, German <br \/>officials wanted &#8220;strong U.S. leadership&#8221; going into the Copenhagen <br \/>summit and advocated for a common position toward major emerging <br \/>economies, particularly China and India.<\/p>\n<p>That missive also gave early glimpses of the early efforts to try to <br \/>dampen sky-high expectations for that meeting &#8212; because of the unlikely<br \/> possibility of U.S. action.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;German leaders recognize the challenge of passing climate change <br \/>legislation in the U.S. and have lowered their expectations for the <br \/>possibility of reaching a legally-binding agreement next month at <br \/>Copenhagen,&#8221; the cable notes. &#8220;They have begun to describe the summit as<br \/> one step in a larger process &#8212; a politically binding framework &#8212; and <br \/>may be preparing the German public for a less ambitious outcome.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Analysts said the Saudi memos, in particular, show the lengths the Obama<br \/> administration went to in order to sway a fierce opponent of <br \/>international climate action. Saudi Arabia, the world&#8217;s largest oil <br \/>producer, has a long tradition of blocking movement in the U.N. climate <br \/>talks. It and other oil-producing nations have, among other things, <br \/>claimed a need for adaptation funding &#8212; normally reserved for the poor <br \/>nations that have done little to cause climate change but are bearing <br \/>the brunt of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/topic.cfm?id=weather\">weather<\/a> disasters and other problems &#8212; because of rising sea levels that threaten offshore oil rigs.<\/p>\n<p>After the Copenhagen summit, Saudi officials expressed &#8220;satisfaction&#8221; <br \/>with the political agreement. But so far, the country has not formally <br \/>associated itself with the agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, said World Resources Institute Climate Director Jennifer <br \/>Morgan, the cables are &#8220;a sign, to me, that the administration is <br \/>serious about climate change, and serious about it as a foreign policy <br \/>topic if it is raising it with one of its partners who takes a different<br \/> position with the U.S.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Leaked Cables Show U.S. Pressured Saudis to Accept Copenhagen Accord The handful of climate-related cables&#8211;among the hundreds of thousands of secret and unclassified messages released by the whistle-blower organization Wikileaks&#8211;show the United States put climate change at the center of its foreign policy relationship with the oil-producing giant By Lisa Friedman and Climatewire November 30,&hellip; <br \/> <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/2010\/12\/01\/u-s-pressured-saudis-to-accept-climate-change-agreement\/\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1028"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1028\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/venusimportexport.com\/wordpress\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}